Editorial policy

Rural Running Review aims to be clear about what a piece says, what supports it and where its limits are. The countryside differs from place to place, so we avoid presenting local conditions or access arrangements as universal.

Accuracy and clarity

We check factual details against suitable sources and distinguish explanation from opinion. We avoid unsupported claims about performance, conditions or access. When a subject depends on local rules, specialist judgement or circumstances that vary, we say so rather than imply one answer fits every reader.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial decisions remain separate from commercial arrangements. Sponsored or partner material is clearly labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial coverage. A partnership does not guarantee favourable coverage, and payment does not determine editorial conclusions.

Corrections

If a reader spots an error, they can contact us with the page and the detail in question. We review credible corrections and amend material when warranted, making significant changes clear to readers where appropriate.

Illustrations

Some illustrations may be generated with artificial intelligence. They are illustrative rather than evidence of a particular route, place, runner or event, and are not presented as documentary photographs.